[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200930204648.GA9098@dev-dsk-fllinden-2c-c1893d73.us-west-2.amazon.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 20:46:48 +0000
From: Frank van der Linden <fllinden@...zon.com>
To: Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
CC: <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>, <anna.schumaker@...app.com>,
<linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: nfs: return per memcg count for xattr shrinkers
On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 04:42:20AM -0700, Yang Shi wrote:
>
> The list_lru_count() returns the pre node count, but the new xattr
> shrinkers are memcg aware, so the shrinkers should return per memcg
> count by calling list_lru_shrink_count() instead. Otherwise over-shrink
> might be experienced. The problem was spotted by visual code
> inspection.
>
> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>
> Cc: Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@...app.com>
> Cc: Frank van der Linden <fllinden@...zon.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
> ---
> fs/nfs/nfs42xattr.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs42xattr.c b/fs/nfs/nfs42xattr.c
> index 86777996cfec..6e5f34916937 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/nfs42xattr.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs42xattr.c
> @@ -882,7 +882,7 @@ nfs4_xattr_cache_count(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc)
> {
> unsigned long count;
>
> - count = list_lru_count(&nfs4_xattr_cache_lru);
> + count = list_lru_shrink_count(&nfs4_xattr_cache_lru, sc);
> return vfs_pressure_ratio(count);
> }
>
> @@ -976,7 +976,7 @@ nfs4_xattr_entry_count(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc)
> lru = (shrink == &nfs4_xattr_large_entry_shrinker) ?
> &nfs4_xattr_large_entry_lru : &nfs4_xattr_entry_lru;
>
> - count = list_lru_count(lru);
> + count = list_lru_shrink_count(lru, sc);
> return vfs_pressure_ratio(count);
> }
>
> --
> 2.26.2
>
Yep, thanks.
Reviewed-by: Frank van der Linden <fllinden@...zon.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists