linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v5] Introduce support for Systems Management Driver over WMI for Dell Systems

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <DM6PR19MB2636FB3D94EBA95B7CE0DE54FA330@DM6PR19MB2636.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Wed, 30 Sep 2020 21:02:38 +0000
From:   "Limonciello, Mario" <Mario.Limonciello@...l.com>
To:     "mgross@...ux.intel.com" <mgross@...ux.intel.com>,
        Divya Bharathi <divya27392@...il.com>
CC:     "dvhart@...radead.org" <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org" 
        <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Bharathi, Divya" <Divya.Bharathi@...l.com>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        "Ksr, Prasanth" <Prasanth.Ksr@...l.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5] Introduce support for Systems Management Driver over
 WMI for Dell Systems

> > +		possible_values:	A file that can be read to obtain the possible
> > +					values of the <attr>. Values are separated using
> > +					semi-colon (``;``).
> why not use set notation from math classes assuming intergers?  i.e.
> (a, b)  all integers beween a and b but not including a or b (open set)
> or
> [a, b] all integerger betwen a and b including and b?  (closed set)
> 
> Anyway its ambiguous if the the extremes are included in the set of possible
> values as written.
> 

Enumeration attributes mean that there are fixed values, specifically not integers.
Integers are in the "integer" type and explained below.

An example value that would be seen here is possible_values:

Enabled;Disabled;

> > +
> > +	security_area_size = calculate_security_buffer();
> > +	buffer_size = security_area_size + integer_area_size;
> > +	buffer = kzalloc(buffer_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	if (!buffer)
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> if you hit this error return I think you will leak the wmi_priv.mutex lock.
> I think this is a bug.

Yes, thanks this is a great finding.
Team will fix in v6 after we have Hans' feedback for v5.