[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2d43d29f-d29c-3dd7-1709-4414f34d27da@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2020 01:34:53 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Eric van Tassell <evantass@....com>,
Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Cannon Matthews <cannonmatthews@...gle.com>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Peter Shier <pshier@...gle.com>,
Peter Feiner <pfeiner@...gle.com>,
Junaid Shahid <junaids@...gle.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Yulei Zhang <yulei.kernel@...il.com>,
Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/22] kvm: mmu: Introduce tdp_iter
On 01/10/20 01:20, Eric van Tassell wrote:
>>
>> +int is_shadow_present_pte(u64 pte)
>> {
>> return (pte != 0) && !is_mmio_spte(pte);
> From <Figure 28-1: Formats of EPTP and EPT Paging-Structure Entries" of
> the manual I don't have at my fingertips right now, I believe you should
> only check the low 3 bits(mask = 0x7). Since the upper bits are ignored,
> might that not mean they're not guaranteed to be 0?
No, this a property of the KVM MMU (and how it builds its PTEs) rather
than the hardware present check.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists