linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] iommu/tegra-smmu: Add PCI support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200930071213.GA13876@Asurada-Nvidia>
Date:   Wed, 30 Sep 2020 00:12:14 -0700
From:   Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>
To:     Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc:     thierry.reding@...il.com, joro@...tes.org, krzk@...nel.org,
        vdumpa@...dia.com, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] iommu/tegra-smmu: Add PCI support

On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 09:01:09AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 30.09.2020 08:34, Nicolin Chen пишет:
> > On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 08:10:35AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> >> 30.09.2020 03:30, Nicolin Chen пишет:
> >>>  void tegra_smmu_remove(struct tegra_smmu *smmu)
> >>>  {
> >>> +	bus_set_iommu(&platform_bus_type, NULL);
> >>
> >> Why only platform_bus? Is this really needed at all?
> > 
> > I see qcom_iommu.c file set to NULL in remove(), Probably should
> > have added pci_bus_type too though.
> > 
> > Or are you sure that there's no need at all?
> > 
> 
> It wasn't here before this patch and platform_bus is unrelated to the
> topic of this patch. But it probably should be there.
> 
> On the other hand, the tegra_smmu_remove() is unused and maybe it could
> be better to get rid of this unused function at all.

I will drop this line then, since no one is calling it. And maybe
we can submit a clean up patch later.