linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] Introduce the for_each_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdY-SwOx9tGyvrZy_VZJgHyG4ipo27bPnTe==o8_b_CTfg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 30 Sep 2020 11:29:38 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>,
        Syed Nayyar Waris <syednwaris@...il.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Robert Richter <rrichter@...vell.com>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...durent.com>,
        Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] Introduce the for_each_set_clump macro

On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 3:14 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:

> Linus, are you referencing to [3]? It was fixed in GENMASK()
> implementation some time ago.
> [3]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202006171559.JSbGJXNw%25lkp@intel.com/

Yup.

I tried to apply the patches again now to test it but now patch 2
needs to be rebased.

Sorry for all the trouble!

Syed can you rebase the patch set on v5.9-rc1 and resend as v10?

Yours,
Linus Walleij