[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200930095719.GW2628@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 11:57:19 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: jun qian <qianjun.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
juri.lelli@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
mgorman@...e.de, Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] sched/fair: Fix the wrong sched_stat_wait time
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 05:16:29PM +0800, jun qian wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> 于2020年9月30日周三 下午4:20写道:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 10:47:12AM +0800, qianjun.kernel@...il.com wrote:
> > > From: jun qian <qianjun.kernel@...il.com>
> > >
> > > When the sched_schedstat changes from 0 to 1, some sched se maybe
> > > already in the runqueue, the se->statistics.wait_start will be 0.
> > > So it will let the (rq_of(cfs_rq)) - se->statistics.wait_start)
> > > wrong. We need to avoid this scenario.
> >
> > Is this really the only problem there? Did you do a full audit of that
> > schedstat nonsense?
> >
>
> Did you mean that the sched_stat_xxx's xxx_start(sched_stat_sleep
> sched_stat_iowait sched_stat_blocked
> sched_stat_runtime) may be also depend the schedstat_enabled?
Yeah, this runtime schedstat_enabled thing is fairly recent, it used to
be an always on/off kinda thing.
At the time we figured inconsistencies from dynamically
enabling/disabling it were okay, it's just stats after all.
But if you now want to 'fix' that, then a full audit might be nice.
> I have searched the codes, and found that these sched_stat_xxx's
> xxx_start don't depend the schedstat_enabled
> except the wait_start.
OK, so you did the audit and only found this one issue? That's good
Changelog material :-)
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists