lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5faea0b8-aaa4-3a02-6086-16ba43f282ea@topic.nl>
Date:   Wed, 30 Sep 2020 12:07:40 +0200
From:   Mike Looijmans <mike.looijmans@...ic.nl>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC:     Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: gpio: pca953x: Add support for the
 NXP PCAL9554B/C


Met vriendelijke groet / kind regards,

Mike Looijmans
System Expert


TOPIC Embedded Products B.V.
Materiaalweg 4, 5681 RJ Best
The Netherlands

T: +31 (0) 499 33 69 69
E: mike.looijmans@...icproducts.com
W: www.topicproducts.com

Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
On 30-09-2020 11:50, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 11:21 AM Mike Looijmans <mike.looijmans@...ic.nl> wrote:
>
>> The NXP PCAL9554B is a variant of the PCA953x GPIO expander,
>> with 8 GPIOs, latched interrupts and some advanced configuration
>> options. The "C" version only differs in I2C address.
>>
>> This adds the entry to the devicetree bindings.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mike Looijmans <mike.looijmans@...ic.nl>
>> ---
>> v2: Split devicetree and code into separate patches
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
>
> This patch 1/2 does not apply to my tree, I suppose Rob has
> to apply it?
>
> I will try to apply 2/2.
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
I based the patches on the current master. Well, master a few days ago. 
A rebase on current master also had no complaints.

-- 
Mike Looijmans

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ