linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] Prevent out-of-bounds access for built-in font data buffers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 30 Sep 2020 06:55:53 -0400
From:   Peilin Ye <yepeilin.cs@...il.com>
To:     Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Cc:     Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Linux Fbdev development list <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
        syzkaller-bugs <syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Prevent out-of-bounds access for built-in font data
 buffers

On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 11:53:17AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 03:11:51AM -0400, Peilin Ye wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 04:38:49PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 2:34 PM Peilin Ye <yepeilin.cs@...il.com> wrote:
> > > > Ah, and speaking of built-in fonts, see fbcon_startup():
> > > >
> > > >         /* Setup default font */
> > > >                 [...]
> > > >                 vc->vc_font.charcount = 256; /* FIXME  Need to support more fonts */
> > > >                             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > > >
> > > > This is because find_font() and get_default_font() return a `struct
> > > > font_desc *`, but `struct font_desc` doesn't contain `charcount`. I
> > > > think we also need to add a `charcount` field to `struct font_desc`.
> > > 
> > > Hm yeah ... I guess maybe struct font_desc should be the starting
> > > point for the kernel internal font structure. It's at least there
> > > already ...
> > 
> > I see, that will also make handling built-in fonts much easier!
> 
> I think the only downside with starting with font_desc as the internal
> font represenation is that there's a few fields we don't need/have for
> userspace fonts (like the id/name stuff). So any helpers to e.g. print out
> font information need to make sure they don't trip over that
> 
> But otherwise I don't see a problem with this, I think.

Yes, and built-in fonts don't use refcount. Or maybe we can let
find_font() and get_default_font() kmalloc() a copy of built-in font
data, then keep track of refcount for both user and built-in fonts, but
that will waste a few K of memory for each built-in font we use...

> > > I think for vc_date->vc_font we might need a multi-step approach:
> > > - first add a new helper function which sets the font for a vc using
> > > an uapi console_font struct (and probably hard-coded assumes cnt ==
> > > 256.
> > 
> > But user fonts may have a charcount different to 256... But yes I'll try
> > to figure out how.
> 
> Hm yeah, maybe we need a helper to give us the charcount then, which by
> default is using the magic negative offset.

Ah, I see! :)

> Then once we've converted everything over to explicitly passing charcount
> around, we can switch that helper. So something like
> 
> int kern_font_charcount(struct kern_font *font);
> 
> Feel free to bikeshed the struct name however you see fit :-)

I think both `kern_font` and `font_desc` makes sense, naming is so
hard...

> > > For first steps I'd start with demidlayering some of the internal
> > > users of uapi structs, like the console_font_op really shouldn't be
> > > used anywhere in any function, except in the ioctl handler that
> > > converts it into the right function call. You'll probably discover a
> > > few other places like this on the go.
> > 
> > Sure, I'll start from this, then cleaning up these dummy functions, then
> > `vc_data`. Thank you for the insights!
> 
> Please don't take this rough plan as fixed, it's just where I'd start from
> browsing the code and your analysis a bit. We'll probably have to adapt as
> we go and more nasty things turn up ...

Sure, I'll first give it a try and see. Thank you!

Peilin Ye