linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] regmap: add support to regmap_field_bulk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200930122719.GA1618571@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 30 Sep 2020 14:27:19 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
        rafael@...nel.org, lgirdwood@...il.com, perex@...ex.cz,
        tiwai@...e.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, srivasam@...eaurora.org,
        rohitkr@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] regmap: add support to
 regmap_field_bulk_alloc/free apis

On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 01:15:52PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 02:11:00PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 01:08:49PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > > We have managed versions of the other regmap allocation functions, it
> > > makes sense for consistency to have managed versions of these too.  I
> > > think there's a meaningful difference between a simple and expected
> > > wrapper like these and infrastructure which hasn't been proved out by
> > > users.
> 
> > Ok, do you think these are really needed?
> 
> > A review would be nice :)
> 
> I applied this patch the other day - ea470b82f205fc in -next.

Great, sorry for the noise.

greg k-h