[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMZfGtWZ739Qd+9WZYtBTbQLjEqJa2BRa=5NBP9QMJQjsJS0mg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 10:56:42 +0800
From: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
To: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, mingo@...hat.com,
bp@...en8.de, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, luto@...nel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, paulmck@...nel.org,
mchehab+huawei@...nel.org, pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, oneukum@...e.com,
anshuman.khandual@....com, jroedel@...e.de,
Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [RFC PATCH 03/24] mm/hugetlb: Introduce a new
config HUGETLB_PAGE_FREE_VMEMMAP
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 7:41 AM Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> On 9/15/20 5:59 AM, Muchun Song wrote:
> > The purpose of introducing HUGETLB_PAGE_FREE_VMEMMAP is to configure
> > whether to enable the feature of freeing unused vmemmap associated
> > with HugeTLB pages.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
> > ---
> > fs/Kconfig | 15 +++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/Kconfig b/fs/Kconfig
> > index 976e8b9033c4..61e9c08096ca 100644
> > --- a/fs/Kconfig
> > +++ b/fs/Kconfig
> > @@ -245,6 +245,21 @@ config HUGETLBFS
> > config HUGETLB_PAGE
> > def_bool HUGETLBFS
> >
> > +config HUGETLB_PAGE_FREE_VMEMMAP
> > + bool "Free unused vmemmap associated with HugeTLB pages"
> > + default n
> > + depends on HUGETLB_PAGE
> > + depends on SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP
> > + depends on HAVE_BOOTMEM_INFO_NODE
> > + help
> > + There are many struct page structure associated with each HugeTLB
> > + page. But we only use a few struct page structure. In this case,
> > + it waste some memory. It is better to free the unused struct page
> > + structures to buddy system which can save some memory. For
> > + architectures that support it, say Y here.
> > +
> > + If unsure, say N.
> > +
>
> I could be wrong, but I believe the convention is introduce the config
> option at the same time code which depends on the option is introduced.
> Therefore, it might be better to combine with the next patch.
Yeah, great. Will do that. Thanks.
>
> Also, it looks like most of your development was done on x86. Should
> this option be limited to x86 only for now?
Now only the x86 has the HAVE_BOOTMEM_INFO_NODE option. So
maybe this is enough :)
> --
> Mike Kravetz
--
Yours,
Muchun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists