[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200930150109.GK29288@alley>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 17:01:09 +0200
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tj@...nel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Zqiang <qiang.zhang@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] kthread: do not modify running work
On Sat 2020-09-26 12:04:26, Hillf Danton wrote:
>
> It does not make much sense to rearm timer for the delayed work if
> it is worker's current work atm because it's good to do work only
> once.
Quite typical scenario is to queue delayed work from its own callback.
It allows to do the work in regular intervals.
This patch would break it. Or do I miss anything?
Best Regards,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists