[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200930151128.GD284424@cisco>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 09:11:28 -0600
From: Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.pizza>
To: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
Cc: Sargun Dhillon <sargun@...gun.me>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
linux-man <linux-man@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, wad@...omium.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@...hat.com>,
Robert Sesek <rsesek@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: For review: seccomp_user_notif(2) manual page
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 09:03:36AM -0600, Tycho Andersen wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 01:07:38PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> > ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
> > │FIXME │
> > ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
> > │Interestingly, after the event had been received, │
> > │the file descriptor indicates as writable (verified │
> > │from the source code and by experiment). How is this │
> > │useful? │
>
> You're saying it should just do EPOLLOUT and not EPOLLWRNORM? Seems
> reasonable.
If we make this change, I suppose we should also drop EPOLLRDNORM from
things which have not been received yet, since they're not really
readable.
Tycho
Powered by blists - more mailing lists