[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87k0wbi94b.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 17:20:52 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Cc: "Dey\, Megha" <megha.dey@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Jon Derrick <jonathan.derrick@...el.com>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@....com>,
Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com>,
Russ Anderson <rja@....com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@...el.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
ravi.v.shankar@...el.com
Subject: Re: [patch V2 00/46] x86, PCI, XEN, genirq ...: Prepare for device MSI
On Wed, Sep 30 2020 at 08:43, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 08:41:48AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 29 2020 at 16:03, Megha Dey wrote:
>> > On 8/26/2020 4:16 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> >> #9 is obviously just for the folks interested in IMS
>> >>
>> >
>> > I see that the tip tree (as of 9/29) has most of these patches but
>> > notice that the DEV_MSI related patches
>> >
>> > haven't made it. I have tested the tip tree(x86/irq branch) with your
>> > DEV_MSI infra patches and our IMS patches with the IDXD driver and was
>>
>> Your IMS patches? Why do you need something special again?
>>
>> > wondering if we should push out those patches as part of our patchset?
>>
>> As I don't have any hardware to test that, I was waiting for you and
>> Jason to confirm that this actually works for the two different IMS
>> implementations.
>
> How urgently do you need this? The code looked good from what I
> understood. It will be a while before we have all the parts to send an
> actual patch though.
I personally do not need it at all :) Megha might have different
thoughts...
> We might be able to put together a mockup just to prove it
If that makes Megha's stuff going that would of course be appreciated,
but we can defer the IMS_QUEUE part for later. It's orthogonal to the
IMS_ARRAY stuff.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists