[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201001175039.GL3956970@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2020 20:50:39 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>
Cc: yong.zhi@...el.com, sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com,
bingbu.cao@...el.com, tian.shu.qiu@...el.com, mchehab@...nel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, robh@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
jorhand@...ux.microsoft.com, kitakar@...il.com,
kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com, dan.carpenter@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] Add functionality to ipu3-cio2 driver allowing
software_node connections to sensors on platforms designed for Windows
On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 10:33:26AM +0100, Daniel Scally wrote:
...
> This patch is dependent on another (which implements the software node graph
> family of functions):
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/20200915232827.3416-1-djrscally@gmail.com/
More thoughts about the (future) series. Can you rather do a series of patches
to understand what is going on here. I see something like this:
patch 1. Add unregister_nodes_reverse()
2. Use above in test_printf.c
3. Add that graph support patch
4. Add T: to MAINTAINERS for IPU3-CIO2
5. Add this patch
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists