linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND 0/9] Some fixes for spi-s3c64xx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 1 Oct 2020 20:43:39 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc:     Lukasz Stelmach <l.stelmach@...sung.com>,
        Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
        Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>, Andi Shyti <andi@...zian.org>,
        linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        m.szyprowski@...sung.com, b.zolnierkie@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND 0/9] Some fixes for spi-s3c64xx

On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 09:02:57PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

> That is correct. We did not provide final comments on the list so they
> could be added here - in change log. This would also be an explanation
> why there is a resend. Another solution would be to extend the commit #7
> description - why only CMU case is covered.

If there's a new changelog then it's not a resend, the changelog is part
of the content so I'd expect a version bump for that alone.  IIRC the
changelog needed some clarification anyway?

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)