linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] DVFS support for Venus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 1 Oct 2020 13:40:13 -0700
From:   Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:     Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org>
Cc:     Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] DVFS support for Venus

Hi,

On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 12:26 AM Stanimir Varbanov
<stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 9/16/20 8:33 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> >
> > On 9/1/2020 7:50 PM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> >> Rob, can you pick PATCH 1 since its already reviewed by you.
> >> Stan, Patch 2 and 3 will need to be picked by you and they both have
> >> your ACKs
> >
> > Rob/Stan, any plans to get the patches merged for 5.10?
>
> 2/5 and 3/5 are queued up for v5.10 through media tree.

Normally I'd expect device tree bindings (patch #1) to go through the
same tree as the driver changes.  Does the media tree work
differently?  If you're expecting Rob Herring to land the device tree
binding change, is he aware?


-Doug