[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <694548eb-9e07-cf1d-72fa-fa29ce78a15c@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2020 16:26:14 -0700
From: "Dey, Megha" <megha.dey@...el.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>, vkoul@...nel.org,
maz@...nel.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com, alex.williamson@...hat.com,
jacob.jun.pan@...el.com, ashok.raj@...el.com, jgg@...lanox.com,
yi.l.liu@...el.com, baolu.lu@...el.com, kevin.tian@...el.com,
sanjay.k.kumar@...el.com, tony.luck@...el.com, jing.lin@...el.com,
dan.j.williams@...el.com, kwankhede@...dia.com,
eric.auger@...hat.com, parav@...lanox.com, rafael@...nel.org,
netanelg@...lanox.com, shahafs@...lanox.com,
yan.y.zhao@...ux.intel.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
samuel.ortiz@...el.com, mona.hossain@...el.com
Cc: dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/18] iommu/vt-d: Add DEV-MSI support
Hi Thomas,
On 9/30/2020 11:32 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15 2020 at 16:27, Dave Jiang wrote:
>> @@ -1303,9 +1303,10 @@ static void intel_irq_remapping_prepare_irte(struct intel_ir_data *data,
>> case X86_IRQ_ALLOC_TYPE_HPET:
>> case X86_IRQ_ALLOC_TYPE_PCI_MSI:
>> case X86_IRQ_ALLOC_TYPE_PCI_MSIX:
>> + case X86_IRQ_ALLOC_TYPE_DEV_MSI:
>> if (info->type == X86_IRQ_ALLOC_TYPE_HPET)
>> set_hpet_sid(irte, info->devid);
>> - else
>> + else if (info->type != X86_IRQ_ALLOC_TYPE_DEV_MSI)
>> set_msi_sid(irte,
>> msi_desc_to_pci_dev(info->desc));
> Gah. this starts to become unreadable.
hmm ok will change it.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/irq_remapping.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/irq_remapping.c
> index 8f4ce72570ce..0c1ea8ceec31 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/irq_remapping.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/irq_remapping.c
> @@ -1271,6 +1271,16 @@ static struct irq_chip intel_ir_chip = {
> .irq_set_vcpu_affinity = intel_ir_set_vcpu_affinity,
> };
>
> +static void irte_prepare_msg(struct msi_msg *msg, int index, int subhandle)
> +{
> + msg->address_hi = MSI_ADDR_BASE_HI;
> + msg->data = sub_handle;
> + msg->address_lo = MSI_ADDR_BASE_LO | MSI_ADDR_IR_EXT_INT |
> + MSI_ADDR_IR_SHV |
> + MSI_ADDR_IR_INDEX1(index) |
> + MSI_ADDR_IR_INDEX2(index);
> +}
> +
> static void intel_irq_remapping_prepare_irte(struct intel_ir_data *data,
> struct irq_cfg *irq_cfg,
> struct irq_alloc_info *info,
> @@ -1312,19 +1322,18 @@ static void intel_irq_remapping_prepare_irte(struct intel_ir_data *data,
> break;
>
> case X86_IRQ_ALLOC_TYPE_HPET:
> + set_hpet_sid(irte, info->hpet_id);
> + irte_prepare_msg(msg, index, sub_handle);
> + break;
> +
> case X86_IRQ_ALLOC_TYPE_MSI:
> case X86_IRQ_ALLOC_TYPE_MSIX:
> - if (info->type == X86_IRQ_ALLOC_TYPE_HPET)
> - set_hpet_sid(irte, info->hpet_id);
> - else
> - set_msi_sid(irte, info->msi_dev);
> -
> - msg->address_hi = MSI_ADDR_BASE_HI;
> - msg->data = sub_handle;
> - msg->address_lo = MSI_ADDR_BASE_LO | MSI_ADDR_IR_EXT_INT |
> - MSI_ADDR_IR_SHV |
> - MSI_ADDR_IR_INDEX1(index) |
> - MSI_ADDR_IR_INDEX2(index);
> + set_msi_sid(irte, info->msi_dev);
> + irte_prepare_msg(msg, index, sub_handle);
> + break;
> +
> + case X86_IRQ_ALLOC_TYPE_DEV_MSI:
> + irte_prepare_msg(msg, index, sub_handle);
> break;
>
> default:
>
> Hmm?
ok so I have no clue what happened here. This was the patch that was
sent out:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/160021246905.67751.1674517279122764758.stgit@djiang5-desk3.ch.intel.com/
and this does not have the above change. Not sure what happened here.
Anyways, this should not be there.
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists