[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9b0cea1e-c9c3-b38f-2bf1-1501133c16ae@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2020 09:49:43 +0300
From: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
To: <vkoul@...nel.org>, <nm@...com>, <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
<robh+dt@...nel.org>, <vigneshr@...com>
CC: <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, <t-kristo@...com>,
<lokeshvutla@...com>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/18] dt-bindings: dma: ti: Add document for K3 BCDMA
Hi Rob,
On 30/09/2020 12.14, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> New binding document for
> Texas Instruments K3 Block Copy DMA (BCDMA).
>
> BCDMA is introduced as part of AM64.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/dma/ti/k3-bcdma.yaml | 183 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 183 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti/k3-bcdma.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti/k3-bcdma.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti/k3-bcdma.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..c84fb641738f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti/k3-bcdma.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,183 @@
...
> + compatible:
> + enum:
> + - ti,am64-dmss-bcdma
Would it be OK if I use ti,am64x-dmss-bcdma or should I stick with
am64-dmss-bcdma.
The TRM refers to the family as AM64x, but having the 'x' in the
compatible did not sounded right.
- Péter
Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki.
Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists