lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6a04c7b7-dd70-10c2-fc69-08b6b6c33d03@collabora.com>
Date:   Thu, 1 Oct 2020 09:59:38 +0200
From:   Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Sean Wang <sean.wang@...nel.org>
Cc:     lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Collabora Kernel ML <kernel@...labora.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>, hsinyi@...omium.org,
        linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: mediatek: Free eint data on failure

Hi,

On 1/10/20 9:58, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 6:33 PM Sean Wang <sean.wang@...nel.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 1:47 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 7:57 PM Sean Wang <sean.wang@...nel.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> v2 seems the same with v1 or I was missing something.
>>>>
>>>> I just thought we call devm_ioremap_release to explicitly to free
>>>> resource when a certain failure occurs after
>>>> devm_ioremap_resource?
>>>
>>> What is the semantics around mtk_build_eint()?
>>>
>>
>> mtk_build_eint is to add external interrupt function to the
>> corresponding bound pins.
>> mtk pinctrl driver still can work (than means probe() successfully) to
>> keep pinctrl functional even with there is an error in mtk_build_eint.
>> So the patch is used to explicitly free those data on failure in
>> mtk_build_eint to let unused data is being free:ed immediately.
> 
> OK then we need a v3 of this that will call *release
> explicitly, indeed.
> 

Yes, don't really know what happened with v2. I'll send a v3 ASAP.

> Thanks Sean!
> Linus Walleij
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ