[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYkxTiC9iMJV8SrMGXHU5jGut8vJ=1WQFK=avXd5PrE_w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2020 10:03:08 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Drew Fustini <drew@...gleboard.org>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Jason Kridner <jkridner@...gleboard.org>,
Robert Nelson <robertcnelson@...il.com>,
Trent Piepho <tpiepho@...il.com>,
Christina Quast <cquast@...overdisplays.com>,
Linux-OMAP <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: single: fix pinctrl_spec.args_count bounds check
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 7:51 PM Drew Fustini <drew@...gleboard.org> wrote:
> The property #pinctrl-cells can either be 1 or 2:
>
> - if #pinctrl-cells = <1>, then pinctrl_spec.args_count = 2
> - if #pinctrl-cells = <2>, then pinctrl_spec.args_count = 3
>
> All other values of pinctrl_spec.args_count are incorrect. This fix
> checks the upper bound instead of just the lower bound.
>
> Fixes: a13395418888 ("pinctrl: single: parse #pinctrl-cells = 2")
> Reported-by: Trent Piepho <tpiepho@...il.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-omap/3139716.CMS8C0sQ7x@zen.local/
> Signed-off-by: Drew Fustini <drew@...gleboard.org>
> ---
> v2 change:
> - correct the description as I had previously been mistakenly using the
> term #pinctrl-cells instead of pinctrl_spec.args_count
Patch applied!
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists