[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871riigxp9.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2020 10:25:06 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
paulmck@...nel.org, rcu@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com, mingo@...nel.org,
jiangshanlai@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, josh@...htriplett.org,
peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com,
joel@...lfernandes.org, mhocko@...nel.org,
mgorman@...hsingularity.net, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/15] drm/i915: Cleanup PREEMPT_COUNT leftovers
On Thu, Oct 01 2020 at 10:17, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> Quoting paulmck@...nel.org (2020-09-29 02:30:58)
>> CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT is now unconditionally enabled and will be
>> removed. Cleanup the leftovers before doing so.
>
> Change looks fine:
>
> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>
>
> Are you looking for us to merge or merge through another tree?
>
> If us, did the base patch always enabling PREEMPT_COUNT go into 5.9 or is
> it heading to 5.10? We can queue this earliest for 5.11 as drm-next closed
> for 5.10 at week of -rc5.
If at all it goes through rcu/tip because it depends on the earlier patches.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists