[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201001100750.GA541087@google.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2020 11:07:50 +0100
From: Andrew Scull <ascull@...gle.com>
To: George-Aurelian Popescu <georgepope@...gle.com>
Cc: maz@...nel.org, catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org,
masahiroy@...nel.org, michal.lkml@...kovi.net,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com, james.morse@....com,
julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com, suzuki.poulose@....com,
natechancellor@...il.com, ndesaulniers@...gle.com,
dbrazdil@...gle.com, broonie@...nel.org, maskray@...gle.com,
keescook@...omium.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
dvyukov@...gle.com, elver@...gle.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
arnd@...db.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/14] KVM: arm64: Add support for creating and checking
a logging buffer inside hyp/nVHE
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 05:27:39PM +0000, George-Aurelian Popescu wrote:
> From: George Popescu <georgepope@...gle.com>
>
> Share a buffer between the kernel and the hyp/nVHE code by using the
> macros from kvm_debug_buffer.h.
>
> The buffer is composed of a writing index and a statically allocated
> array. The writing index counts how many elements have been written inside
> the buffer and should be set to zero whenever the code goes back to
> EL2 with the clear_kvm_debug_buffer macro.
>
> To avoid consistency problems the buffer is defined per_cpu and is designed
> to be read-only from the kernel perspective.
>
> Check if there is any logging data from hyp/nVHE code.
>
> Every time when the state returns back to the kernel after an hvc call,
> the __kvm_arm_check_debug_buffer macro checks if there is any data inside
> one of the predefined buffers.
>
> Signed-off-by: George Popescu <georgepope@...gle.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_debug_buffer.h | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 6 ++++
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/hyp-entry.S | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_debug_buffer.h
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_debug_buffer.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_debug_buffer.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..30c9b0b1a7bf
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_debug_buffer.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> +/*
> + * Copyright 2020 Google LLC
> + * Author: George Popescu <georgepope@...gle.com>
> + */
> +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> +
> +#include <linux/percpu-defs.h>
> +#include <asm/kvm_asm.h>
> +
> +#ifdef __KVM_NVHE_HYPERVISOR__
> +#define DEFINE_KVM_DEBUG_BUFFER(type_name, buff_name, size) \
> + DEFINE_PER_CPU(type_name, buff_name)[(size)]; \
> + DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, buff_name##_wr_ind) = 0
> +
> +#define DECLARE_KVM_DEBUG_BUFFER(type_name, buff_name, size) \
> + DECLARE_PER_CPU(type_name, buff_name)[(size)]; \
> + DECLARE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, buff_name##_wr_ind)
> +
> +#else
> +
> +#define DECLARE_KVM_DEBUG_BUFFER(type_name, buff_name, size) \
> + DECLARE_PER_CPU(type_name, kvm_nvhe_sym(buff_name))[(size)]; \
> + DECLARE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, kvm_nvhe_sym(buff_name##_wr_ind))
> +#endif //__KVM_NVHE_HYPERVISOR__
nit: comment style, here and below
> +
> +#else
> +
> +.macro clear_kvm_debug_buffer sym tmp1, tmp2, tmp3
> + mov \tmp1, 0
> + hyp_str_this_cpu \sym, \tmp1, \tmp2, \tmp3
> +.endm
Can you can use xzr (zero register) directly rather than moving the
constant 0 into a temporary?
hyp_str_this_cpu \sym, xzr, \tmp1, \tmp2
> +
> +#endif // __ASSEMBLY__
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 905c2b87e05a..adc8957e9321 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -494,6 +494,10 @@ u64 __kvm_call_hyp(void *hypfn, ...);
> __kvm_call_hyp(kvm_ksym_ref_nvhe(f), ##__VA_ARGS__); \
> })
>
> +#define __kvm_arm_check_debug_buffer() \
> +{ \
> +}
> +
> /*
> * The couple of isb() below are there to guarantee the same behaviour
> * on VHE as on !VHE, where the eret to EL1 acts as a context
> @@ -506,6 +510,7 @@ u64 __kvm_call_hyp(void *hypfn, ...);
> isb(); \
> } else { \
> kvm_call_hyp_nvhe(f, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
> + __kvm_arm_check_debug_buffer(); \
> } \
> } while(0)
>
> @@ -518,6 +523,7 @@ u64 __kvm_call_hyp(void *hypfn, ...);
> isb(); \
> } else { \
> ret = kvm_call_hyp_nvhe_ret(f, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
> + __kvm_arm_check_debug_buffer(); \
As Will was pointing out earlier, does the checking need to have
preemption disabled in case there is another call into hyp that corrupts
the buffer while it is being checked?
> } \
> \
> ret; \
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/hyp-entry.S b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/hyp-entry.S
> index 46b4dab933d0..8df0082b9ccf 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/hyp-entry.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/hyp-entry.S
> @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ el1_sync: // Guest trapped into EL2
> cbnz x1, el1_hvc_guest // called HVC
>
> /* Here, we're pretty sure the host called HVC. */
> - ldp x0, x1, [sp], #16
> + ldp x0, x1, [sp], #16
Is this a whitespace change? Maybe drop from this patch if it isn't
related.
>
> /* Check for a stub HVC call */
> cmp x0, #HVC_STUB_HCALL_NR
> --
> 2.28.0.618.gf4bc123cb7-goog
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists