[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72mSjs4myQQtUoegjRggjTx9UF70nAcWoXRoTeLMOuf0xQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2020 12:15:39 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
Clang-Built-Linux ML <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH next-20200930] treewide: Convert macro and uses of
__section(foo) to __section("foo")
Hi Joe,
On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 12:56 AM Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
>
> So I installed the powerpc cross compiler, and
> nope, that doesn't work, it makes a mess.
Thanks a lot for reviving the script and sending the treewide cleanup!
> So it looks like the best option is to exclude these
> 2 files from conversion.
Agreed. Nevertheless, is there any reason arch/powerpc/* should not be
compiling cleanly with compiler.h? (CC'ing the rest of the PowerPC
reviewers and ML).
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists