[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20201001103314.136645-1-dwaipayanray1@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2020 16:03:14 +0530
From: Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>
To: joe@...ches.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
dwaipayanray1@...il.com, lukas.bulwahn@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH RFC] checkpatch: fix multi-statement macro checks
Checkpatch.pl doesn't have a check for excluding while (...) {...}
blocks from MULTISTATEMENT_MACRO_USE_DO_WHILE error.
For example, running checkpatch.pl on the file mm/access.c in the
kernel generates the following error:
ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses
+#define copy_from_kernel_nofault_loop(dst, src, len, type, err_label) \
+ while (len >= sizeof(type)) { \
+ __get_kernel_nofault(dst, src, type, err_label); \
+ dst += sizeof(type); \
+ src += sizeof(type); \
+ len -= sizeof(type); \
+ }
The error is misleading for this case. Enclosing it in parantheses
doesn't make any sense.
Checkpatch already has an exception list for such common macro types.
Added a new exception for while (...) {...} style blocks to the same.
This effectively fixed the wrong error message.
Signed-off-by: Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>
---
scripts/checkpatch.pl | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index 72c4072307ea..c2c211374662 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -5342,6 +5342,7 @@ sub process {
$dstat !~ /^\.$Ident\s*=/ && # .foo =
$dstat !~ /^(?:\#\s*$Ident|\#\s*$Constant)\s*$/ && # stringification #foo
$dstat !~ /^do\s*$Constant\s*while\s*$Constant;?$/ && # do {...} while (...); // do {...} while (...)
+ $dstat !~ /^while\s*$Constant\s*$Constant\s*$/ && # while (...) {...}
$dstat !~ /^for\s*$Constant$/ && # for (...)
$dstat !~ /^for\s*$Constant\s+(?:$Ident|-?$Constant)$/ && # for (...) bar()
$dstat !~ /^do\s*{/ && # do {...
--
2.27.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists