[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <641fa138-23b7-8fdd-27f9-87e2fdd9fa91@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2020 06:49:36 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 1/4] perf/core: Add PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_PAGE_SIZE
On 9/30/20 10:30 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> In general though; I think using ->active_mm is a mistake though. That
> code should be doing something like:
>
>
> mm = current->mm;
> if (!mm)
> mm = &init_mm;
>
I was hoping that using ->active_mm would give us the *actual* copy of
the page tables that's loaded in CR3 for kernel thraeds. But, there are
few if any practical advantages of doing that at the moment.
Using that ^ is fine with me.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists