[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20201001160154.3587848-8-enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2020 18:01:49 +0200
From: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Collabora Kernel ML <kernel@...labora.com>, fparent@...libre.com,
matthias.bgg@...il.com, drinkcat@...omium.org, hsinyi@...omium.org,
weiyi.lu@...iatek.com, Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@...e.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 07/12] soc: mediatek: pm-domains: Add extra sram control
From: Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@...e.com>
For some power domains like vpu_core on MT8183 whose sram need to do clock
and internal isolation while power on/off sram. We add a cap
"MTK_SCPD_SRAM_ISO" to judge if we need to do the extra sram isolation
control or not.
Signed-off-by: Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@...iatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- Nit, split readl(ctl_addr) | pd->data->sram_pdn_bits in two lines.
- Use regmap API
drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
index 38f2630bdd0a..e0a52d489fea 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
#define MTK_SCPD_ACTIVE_WAKEUP BIT(0)
#define MTK_SCPD_FWAIT_SRAM BIT(1)
+#define MTK_SCPD_SRAM_ISO BIT(2)
#define MTK_SCPD_CAPS(_scpd, _x) ((_scpd)->data->caps & (_x))
#define SPM_VDE_PWR_CON 0x0210
@@ -42,6 +43,8 @@
#define PWR_ON_BIT BIT(2)
#define PWR_ON_2ND_BIT BIT(3)
#define PWR_CLK_DIS_BIT BIT(4)
+#define PWR_SRAM_CLKISO_BIT BIT(5)
+#define PWR_SRAM_ISOINT_B_BIT BIT(6)
#define PWR_STATUS_DISP BIT(3)
#define PWR_STATUS_MFG BIT(4)
@@ -155,14 +158,28 @@ static int scpsys_sram_enable(struct scpsys_domain *pd)
struct scpsys *scpsys = pd->scpsys;
u32 val;
int tmp;
+ int ret;
regmap_read(scpsys->base, pd->data->ctl_offs, &val);
val &= ~pd->data->sram_pdn_bits;
regmap_write(scpsys->base, pd->data->ctl_offs, val);
/* Either wait until SRAM_PDN_ACK all 1 or 0 */
- return regmap_read_poll_timeout(scpsys->base, pd->data->ctl_offs, tmp,
- (tmp & pdn_ack) == 0, MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
+ ret = regmap_read_poll_timeout(scpsys->base, pd->data->ctl_offs, tmp,
+ (tmp & pdn_ack) == 0, MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+
+ if (MTK_SCPD_CAPS(pd, MTK_SCPD_SRAM_ISO)) {
+ regmap_read(scpsys->base, pd->data->ctl_offs, &val);
+ val |= PWR_SRAM_ISOINT_B_BIT;
+ regmap_write(scpsys->base, pd->data->ctl_offs, val);
+ udelay(1);
+ val &= ~PWR_SRAM_CLKISO_BIT;
+ regmap_write(scpsys->base, pd->data->ctl_offs, val);
+ }
+
+ return 0;
}
static int scpsys_sram_disable(struct scpsys_domain *pd)
@@ -172,6 +189,15 @@ static int scpsys_sram_disable(struct scpsys_domain *pd)
u32 val;
int tmp;
+ if (MTK_SCPD_CAPS(pd, MTK_SCPD_SRAM_ISO)) {
+ regmap_read(scpsys->base, pd->data->ctl_offs, &val);
+ val |= PWR_SRAM_CLKISO_BIT;
+ regmap_write(scpsys->base, pd->data->ctl_offs, val);
+ val &= ~PWR_SRAM_ISOINT_B_BIT;
+ regmap_write(scpsys->base, pd->data->ctl_offs, val);
+ udelay(1);
+ }
+
regmap_read(scpsys->base, pd->data->ctl_offs, &val);
val |= pd->data->sram_pdn_bits;
regmap_write(scpsys->base, pd->data->ctl_offs, val);
--
2.28.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists