[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201001160354.GC29330@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2020 09:03:54 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
rcu@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...com, mingo@...nel.org, jiangshanlai@...il.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
oleg@...hat.com, joel@...lfernandes.org, mhocko@...nel.org,
mgorman@...hsingularity.net, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/15] drm/i915: Cleanup PREEMPT_COUNT
leftovers
On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 10:25:06AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 01 2020 at 10:17, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> > Quoting paulmck@...nel.org (2020-09-29 02:30:58)
> >> CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT is now unconditionally enabled and will be
> >> removed. Cleanup the leftovers before doing so.
> >
> > Change looks fine:
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>
Applied, thank you!
> > Are you looking for us to merge or merge through another tree?
> >
> > If us, did the base patch always enabling PREEMPT_COUNT go into 5.9 or is
> > it heading to 5.10? We can queue this earliest for 5.11 as drm-next closed
> > for 5.10 at week of -rc5.
>
> If at all it goes through rcu/tip because it depends on the earlier patches.
I was figuring on sending a pull request later today, Pacific Time.
Thanx, Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists