[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <VI1PR10MB2446AE70D793A5DD8490A5B9AB310@VI1PR10MB2446.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2020 19:56:50 +0000
From: "Geva, Erez" <erez.geva.ext@...mens.com>
To: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, Andrei Vagin <avagin@...il.com>,
Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@...il.com>,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Vladis Dronov <vdronov@...hat.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
CC: Jesus Sanchez-Palencia <jesus.sanchez-palencia@...el.com>,
Vedang Patel <vedang.patel@...el.com>,
"Sudler, Simon" <simon.sudler@...mens.com>,
"Meisinger, Andreas" <andreas.meisinger@...mens.com>,
"Bucher, Andreas" <andreas.bucher@...mens.com>,
"henning.schild@...mens.com" <henning.schild@...mens.com>,
"jan.kiszka@...mens.com" <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
"Zirkler, Andreas" <andreas.zirkler@...mens.com>,
"Sakic, Ermin" <ermin.sakic@...mens.com>,
"anninh.nguyen@...mens.com" <anninh.nguyen@...mens.com>,
"Saenger, Michael" <michael.saenger@...mens.com>,
"Maehringer, Bernd" <bernd.maehringer@...mens.com>,
"gisela.greinert@...mens.com" <gisela.greinert@...mens.com>,
Erez Geva <ErezGeva2@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] TC-ETF support PTP clocks series
On 02/10/2020 21:01, Vinicius Costa Gomes wrote:
> Hi Erez,
>
> Erez Geva <erez.geva.ext@...mens.com> writes:
>
>> Add support for using PTP clock with
>> Traffic control Earliest TxTime First (ETF) Qdisc.
>>
>> Why do we need ETF to use PTP clock?
>> Current ETF requires to synchronization the system clock
>> to the PTP Hardware clock (PHC) we want to send through.
>> But there are cases that we can not synchronize the system clock with
>> the desire NIC PHC.
>> 1. We use several NICs with several PTP domains that our device
>> is not allowed to be PTP master.
>> And we are not allowed to synchronize these PTP domains.
>> 2. We are using another clock source which we need for our system.
>> Yet our device is not allowed to be PTP master.
>> Regardless of the exact topology, as the Linux tradition is to allow
>> the user the freedom to choose, we propose a patch that will allow
>> the user to configure the TC-ETF with a PTP clock as well as
>> using the system clock.
>> * NOTE: we do encourage the users to synchronize the system clock with
>> a PTP clock.
>> As the ETF watchdog uses the system clock.
>> Synchronizing the system clock with a PTP clock will probably
>> reduce the frequency different of the PHC and the system clock.
>> As sequence, the user might be able to reduce the ETF delta time
>> and the packets latency cross the network.
>>
>> Follow the decision to derive a dynamic clock ID from the file description
>> of an opened PTP clock device file.
>> We propose a simple way to use the dynamic clock ID with the ETF Qdisc.
>> We will submit a patch to the "tc" tool from the iproute2 project
>> once this patch is accepted.
>>
>
> In addition to what Thomas said, I would like to add some thoughts
> (mostly re-wording some of Thomas' comments :-)).
>
> I think that there's an underlying problem/limitation that is the cause
> of the issue (or at least a step in the right direction) you are trying
> to solve: the issue is that PTP clocks can't be used as hrtimers.
>
> I didn't spend a lot of time thinking about how to solve this (the only
> thing that comes to mind is having a timecounter, or similar, "software
> view" over the PHC clock).
>
> Anyway, my feeling is that until this is solved, we would only be
> working around the problem, and creating even more hard to handle corner
> cases.
>
>
> Cheers,
>
You are right.
Thanks for the insight.
Erez
Powered by blists - more mailing lists