lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 02 Oct 2020 15:29:25 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     colyli@...e.de
Cc:     linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, open-iscsi@...glegroups.com,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, chaitanya.kulkarni@....com,
        cleech@...hat.com, hch@....de, amwang@...hat.com,
        eric.dumazet@...il.com, hare@...e.de, idryomov@...il.com,
        jack@...e.com, jlayton@...nel.org, axboe@...nel.dk,
        lduncan@...e.com, michaelc@...wisc.edu,
        mskorzhinskiy@...arflare.com, philipp.reisner@...bit.com,
        sagi@...mberg.me, vvs@...tuozzo.com, vbabka@...e.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/7] Introduce sendpage_ok() to detect misused
 sendpage in network related drivers

From: Coly Li <colyli@...e.de>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2020 16:30:12 +0800

> Obviously my fault and no excuse for leaking this uncompleted version to
> you. I just re-post a v10 version which I make sure all patches are the
> latest version.
> 
> Sorry for the inconvenience and thank you in advance for taking this set.

How did this happen?

How did you functionally test the patch set if it didn't even compile?

I want you to explain why you sent a completely untested patch set.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ