[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201002154222.3adfe408@hermes.local>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2020 15:42:22 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>,
Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Thomas Davis <tadavis@....gov>, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 6/6] bonding: make Kconfig toggle to disable
legacy interfaces
On Fri, 2 Oct 2020 16:23:46 -0400
Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 3:13 PM Stephen Hemminger
> <stephen@...workplumber.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2 Oct 2020 13:40:01 -0400
> > Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> > > By default, enable retaining all user-facing API that includes the use of
> > > master and slave, but add a Kconfig knob that allows those that wish to
> > > remove it entirely do so in one shot.
> > >
> > > Cc: Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>
> > > Cc: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>
> > > Cc: Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>
> > > Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
> > > Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> > > Cc: Thomas Davis <tadavis@....gov>
> > > Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
> > > Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/net/Kconfig | 12 ++++++++++++
> > > drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 4 ++--
> > > drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c | 4 ++--
> > > drivers/net/bonding/bond_procfs.c | 8 ++++++++
> > > drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c | 14 ++++++++++----
> > > drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs_port.c | 6 ++++--
> > > 6 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > >
> >
> > This is problematic. You are printing both old and new values.
> > Also every distribution will have to enable it.
> >
> > This looks like too much of change to users.
>
> I'd had a bit of feedback that people would rather see both, and be
> able to toggle off the old ones, rather than only having one or the
> other, depending on the toggle, so I thought I'd give this a try. I
> kind of liked the one or the other route, but I see the problems with
> that too.
>
> For simplicity, I'm kind of liking the idea of just not updating the
> proc and sysfs interfaces, have a toggle entirely disable them, and
> work on enhancing userspace to only use netlink, but ... it's going to
> be a while before any such work makes its way to any already shipping
> distros. I don't have a satisfying answer here.
>
I like the idea of having bonding proc and sysf apis optional.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists