lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c2dd3223-bda1-be8c-fbc4-9c0eec63bc9d@kernel.dk>
Date:   Fri, 2 Oct 2020 17:44:22 -0600
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>, idryomov@...il.com,
        dongsheng.yang@...ystack.cn
Cc:     ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: drivers/block/rbd.c: atomic_inc_return_safe() &
 atomic_dec_return_safe()

On 10/2/20 4:34 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
> All,
> 
> I came across these atomic_inc_return_safe() & atomic_dec_return_safe()
> functions that hold the counters at safe values.
> 
> atomic_inc_return_safe()
> 
> If the counter is already 0 it will not be incremented.
> If the counter is already at its maximum value returns
> -EINVAL without updating it.
> 
> atomic_dec_return_safe()
> 
> Decrement the counter.  Return the resulting value, or -EINVAL
> 
> These two routines are static and only used in rbd.c.
> 
> Can these become part of atomic_t ops?

I think you just want to use refcount_t for this use case. They
have safe guards for under/overflow.

-- 
Jens Axboe

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ