lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 2 Oct 2020 11:21:10 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:     Alexander Dahl <post@...pocky.de>
Cc:     linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        "linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Alexander Dahl <ada@...rsis.com>,
        Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
        Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/7] dt-bindings: mfd: Fix schema warnings for pwm-leds

On Thu, 1 Oct 2020 at 01:51, Alexander Dahl <post@...pocky.de> wrote:
>
> The node names for devices using the pwm-leds driver follow a certain
> naming scheme (now).

What warning? Please post them here and in every DTS patch.

Your schema does not enforce pwmleds node naming (the main node, not
children), or at least I could not see it. You change multiple files
in your patchset so are you sure that all these are justified by
warnings pointed out by schema?

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ