lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4533120.poq1GmoeVQ@ada>
Date:   Fri, 02 Oct 2020 11:27:32 +0200
From:   Alexander Dahl <ada@...rsis.com>
To:     linux-leds@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Alexander Dahl <post@...pocky.de>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        "linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
        Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/7] ARM: dts: Fix schema warnings for pwm-leds

Hello Krzysztof,

Am Freitag, 2. Oktober 2020, 11:12:50 CEST schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:
> On Thu, 1 Oct 2020 at 01:53, Alexander Dahl <post@...pocky.de> wrote:
> > The node names for devices using the pwm-leds driver follow a certain
> > naming scheme (now).
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Dahl <post@...pocky.de>
> > ---
> > 
> > Notes:
> >     v6:
> >       * added this patch to series
> >  
> >  arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-kizbox.dts             | 10 +++----
> >  arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-kizbox2-common.dtsi    |  8 +++---
> >  arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-kizbox3-hs.dts         | 16 ++++++------
> >  arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-kizbox3_common.dtsi    | 10 +++----
> >  arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-kizboxmini-common.dtsi |  8 +++---
> >  arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9m10g45ek.dts        | 10 +++----
> >  arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9rlek.dts            | 10 +++----
> >  .../boot/dts/berlin2cd-google-chromecast.dts  |  6 ++---
> >  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidhc1.dts    |  4 +--
> >  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidxu4.dts    |  4 +--
> 
> Somehow you did not CC the maintainers... please use
> scripts/get_maintainers.pl to obtain list of addresses.

Well, that will be a huge list of Cc then.  What is the policy?  Everybody 
gets the whole series or different list of receivers per patch?

> All these should be separate patches per sub-architecture.

I already suspected that.  Will do in v7.

Thanks for your feedback.
Alex



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ