[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4533120.poq1GmoeVQ@ada>
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2020 11:27:32 +0200
From: Alexander Dahl <ada@...rsis.com>
To: linux-leds@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Alexander Dahl <post@...pocky.de>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/7] ARM: dts: Fix schema warnings for pwm-leds
Hello Krzysztof,
Am Freitag, 2. Oktober 2020, 11:12:50 CEST schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:
> On Thu, 1 Oct 2020 at 01:53, Alexander Dahl <post@...pocky.de> wrote:
> > The node names for devices using the pwm-leds driver follow a certain
> > naming scheme (now).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Dahl <post@...pocky.de>
> > ---
> >
> > Notes:
> > v6:
> > * added this patch to series
> >
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-kizbox.dts | 10 +++----
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-kizbox2-common.dtsi | 8 +++---
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-kizbox3-hs.dts | 16 ++++++------
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-kizbox3_common.dtsi | 10 +++----
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-kizboxmini-common.dtsi | 8 +++---
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9m10g45ek.dts | 10 +++----
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9rlek.dts | 10 +++----
> > .../boot/dts/berlin2cd-google-chromecast.dts | 6 ++---
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidhc1.dts | 4 +--
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidxu4.dts | 4 +--
>
> Somehow you did not CC the maintainers... please use
> scripts/get_maintainers.pl to obtain list of addresses.
Well, that will be a huge list of Cc then. What is the policy? Everybody
gets the whole series or different list of receivers per patch?
> All these should be separate patches per sub-architecture.
I already suspected that. Will do in v7.
Thanks for your feedback.
Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists