[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201002130008.GA2500@C02TD0UTHF1T.local>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2020 14:00:08 +0100
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/atomics: Check atomic-arch-fallback.h too
On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 10:20:28PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> The sha1sum of include/linux/atomic-arch-fallback.h isn't checked by
> check-atomics.sh. It's not clear why it's skipped so let's check it too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
This was an oversight; Peter and I forgot to add this when Peter added
the arch fallbacks in commit:
37f8173dd84936ea ("locking/atomics: Flip fallbacks and instrumentation")
... for which we could arguably add a fixes tag.
Either way:
Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Peter, I assume you'll pick this up (and also that the hash is
up-to-date as it should be).
> ---
> It seems it never has been checked. So this does cast some doubt about
> the usefulness of these tests. But I'm clueless about this atomic stuff
> so what do I know?
The tests have been useful to ensure people fixed up the scripts when
altering other files, so I think it makes sense to keep this even if we
did miss one file recently.
Mark.
>
> scripts/atomic/check-atomics.sh | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/atomic/check-atomics.sh b/scripts/atomic/check-atomics.sh
> index 8378c63a1e09..82748d42ecc5 100755
> --- a/scripts/atomic/check-atomics.sh
> +++ b/scripts/atomic/check-atomics.sh
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ fi
> cat <<EOF |
> asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h
> asm-generic/atomic-long.h
> +linux/atomic-arch-fallback.h
> linux/atomic-fallback.h
> EOF
> while read header; do
> --
> 2.26.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists