lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 2 Oct 2020 10:00:21 -0700
From:   Paul Eggert <eggert@...ucla.edu>
To:     David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
        'Alejandro Colomar' <colomar.6.4.3@...il.com>
Cc:     "mtk.manpages@...il.com" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
        "linux-man@...r.kernel.org" <linux-man@...r.kernel.org>,
        "libc-alpha@...rceware.org" <libc-alpha@...rceware.org>,
        "gcc@....gnu.org" <gcc@....gnu.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] system_data_types.7: Add 'void *'

On 10/2/20 2:10 AM, David Laight wrote:
>>   > Also, you should
>>   > warn that because one can convert from any pointer type to void * and
>>   > then to any other pointer type, it's a deliberate hole in C's
>>   > type-checking.
>>
> That isn't what the C standard says at all.
> What is says is that you can cast any data pointer to 'void *'
> and then cast it back to the same type.

I was talking about compile-time checking; you're talking about run-time 
behavior. We're both right in our own domains. It is a tricky area, and this 
suggests that perhaps we shouldn't be trying to document this stuff in a 
libc/kernel manual.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ