linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v1 14/26] docs: reporting-bugs: make users write notes, one for each issue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 2 Oct 2020 10:35:35 -0700
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc:     linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 14/26] docs: reporting-bugs: make users write
 notes, one for each issue

On 10/1/20 1:39 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Tell users to write some rough notes how to reproduce the issue. They
> will need those notes soon once they have to reproduce the issue with
> the latest mainline kernel. At the same time they can serve as basis for
> the report later.
> 
> While at it point out that each report should focus on one issue, as
> that is a good time for it: it will make the notes more straight forward
> if the reader deal with multiple issues at once.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info>
> ---
>  Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-bugs.rst | 35 +++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-bugs.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-bugs.rst
> index 2292b79cf462..f99d92a05bca 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-bugs.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-bugs.rst
> @@ -617,6 +617,32 @@ should minimize it:
>     look like a regression.
>  
>  
> +Document how to reproduce issue
> +-------------------------------
> +
> +    *Write down coarsely how to reproduce the issue. If you deal with multiple
> +    issue at once, create separate notes for each of them and make sure they

       issues

> +    work independently on a freshly booted system. That's needed, as each issue
> +    needs to get reported to the kernel developers separately, unless they are
> +    strongly entangled.*
> +
> +If you deal with multiple issue at once, you'll have to report each of them

                             issues

> +separately, as they might be handled by different developers. Describing various
> +issues in one report also makes it quite difficult for others to tear it apart.
> +Hence, only combine issues in one report if they are strongly entangled.
> +
> +Additionally, during the reporting process you will have to test if the issue
> +happens with other kernel versions. Therefore, it will make your work easier if
> +you know exactly how to reproduce it quickly on a freshly booted system.
> +
> +Note: it's often fruitless to debug issues that only happened once, as they
> +might be caused by a bit flip due to cosmic radiation. That's why you should try
> +to rule that out by reproducing the issue before going further. Feed free to

                                                                   Feel

> +ignore this if you are experienced enough to tell a one-time error due to faulty
> +hardware apart from a kernel issue that rarely happens and thus is hard to
> +reproduce.
> +
> +
>  .. ############################################################################
>  .. Temporary marker added while this document is rewritten. Sections above
>  .. are new and dual-licensed under GPLv2+ and CC-BY 4.0, those below are old.
> @@ -639,15 +665,6 @@ How to report Linux kernel bugs
>  ===============================
>  
>  
> -Tips for reporting bugs
> ------------------------
> -
> -It's REALLY important to report bugs that seem unrelated as separate email
> -threads or separate bugzilla entries.  If you report several unrelated
> -bugs at once, it's difficult for maintainers to tease apart the relevant
> -data.
> -
> -
>  Gather information
>  ------------------
>  
> 


-- 
~Randy