linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 8/8] WIP: add a dma_alloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201002175040.GA1131147@chromium.org>
Date:   Fri, 2 Oct 2020 17:50:40 +0000
From:   Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] WIP: add a dma_alloc_contiguous API

Hi Christoph,

On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 06:09:17PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Add a new API that returns a virtually non-contigous array of pages
> and dma address.  This API is only implemented for dma-iommu and will
> not be implemented for non-iommu DMA API instances that have to allocate
> contiguous memory.  It is up to the caller to check if the API is
> available.

Would you mind scheding some more light on what made the previous attempt
not work well? I liked the previous API because it was more consistent with
the regular dma_alloc_coherent().

> 
> The intent is that media drivers can use this API if either:

FWIW, the USB subsystem also has similar needs, and so do some DRM drivers
using DMA API rather than IOMMU API directly. Basically I believe that all
the users removed in your previous series relied on custom downstream
patches to make DMA_ATTR_NON_CONSISTENT work and could be finally made work
in upstream using this API.

> 
>  - no kernel mapping or only temporary kernel mappings are required.
>    That is as a better replacement for DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING
>  - a kernel mapping is required for cached and DMA mapped pages, but
>    the driver also needs the pages to e.g. map them to userspace.
>    In that sense it is a replacement for some aspects of the recently
>    removed and never fully implemented DMA_ATTR_NON_CONSISTENT

What's the expected allocation and mapping flow with the latter? Would that be

pages = dma_alloc_noncoherent(...)
vaddr = vmap(pages, ...);

?

Would one just use the usual dma_sync_for_{cpu,device}() for cache
invallidate/clean, while keeping the mapping in place?

Best regards,
Tomasz