[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VeO9NGAU_zH99wqS9F9mXANNWaep=j_Pi6YAz_hsCxR2g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2020 21:24:55 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>
Cc: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Ramil Zaripov <Ramil.Zaripov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Pavel Parkhomenko <Pavel.Parkhomenko@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>,
"wuxu . wu" <wuxu.wu@...wei.com>, Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/21] spi: dw: Detach SPI device specific CR0 config method
On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 8:47 PM Serge Semin
<Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 01:22:46PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 01:28:11AM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> > > + /*
> > > + * Update CR0 data each time the setup callback is invoked since
> > > + * the device parameters could have been changed, for instance, by
> > > + * the MMC SPI driver or something else.
> > > + */
> > > + chip->cr0 = dw_spi_get_cr0(dws, spi);
> >
>
> > I would rather name it prepare or alike. 'get' assumes getting value or
> > something like that.
>
> This seems reasonable. What verb do you think would be better: prepare,
> calc, assemble, construct, make, compute, collect, compose, form, compile, etc ?
> Personally prepare or calc or assemble are the best candidates. What do you
> think?
prepare is good enough if you agree on it.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists