linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] media: mtk-vcodec: add missing put_device() call in mtk_vcodec_init_dec

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f155ec8b-9036-55b4-2624-a042b6e26866@xs4all.nl>
Date:   Sat, 3 Oct 2020 13:19:34 +0200
From:   Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
To:     Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>, tiffany.lin@...iatek.com,
        andrew-ct.chen@...iatek.com, mchehab@...nel.org,
        matthias.bgg@...il.com
Cc:     linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        yi.zhang@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] media: mtk-vcodec: add missing put_device() call in
 mtk_vcodec_init_dec_pm()

On 24/09/2020 10:18, Yu Kuai wrote:
> if of_find_device_by_node() succeed, mtk_vcodec_init_dec_pm() doesn't have
> a corresponding put_device(). Thus add jump target to fix the exception
> handling for this function implementation.
> 
> Fixes: 590577a4e525 ("[media] vcodec: mediatek: Add Mediatek V4L2 Video Decoder Driver")
> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
> ---
>  .../platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_dec_pm.c    | 18 ++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_dec_pm.c b/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_dec_pm.c
> index 5a6ec8fb52da..01e680ede9bd 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_dec_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_dec_pm.c
> @@ -48,11 +48,14 @@ int mtk_vcodec_init_dec_pm(struct mtk_vcodec_dev *mtkdev)
>  		dec_clk->clk_info = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev,
>  			dec_clk->clk_num, sizeof(*clk_info),
>  			GFP_KERNEL);
> -		if (!dec_clk->clk_info)
> -			return -ENOMEM;
> +		if (!dec_clk->clk_info) {
> +			ret = -ENOMEM;
> +			goto put_device;
> +		}
>  	} else {
>  		mtk_v4l2_err("Failed to get vdec clock count");
> -		return -EINVAL;
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		goto put_device;
>  	}
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < dec_clk->clk_num; i++) {
> @@ -61,19 +64,22 @@ int mtk_vcodec_init_dec_pm(struct mtk_vcodec_dev *mtkdev)
>  			"clock-names", i, &clk_info->clk_name);
>  		if (ret) {
>  			mtk_v4l2_err("Failed to get clock name id = %d", i);
> -			return ret;
> +			goto put_device;
>  		}
>  		clk_info->vcodec_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev,
>  			clk_info->clk_name);
>  		if (IS_ERR(clk_info->vcodec_clk)) {
>  			mtk_v4l2_err("devm_clk_get (%d)%s fail", i,
>  				clk_info->clk_name);
> -			return PTR_ERR(clk_info->vcodec_clk);
> +			ret = PTR_ERR(clk_info->vcodec_clk);
> +			goto put_device;
>  		}
>  	}
>  
>  	pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
> -
> +	return 0;
> +put_device:
> +	put_device(pm->larbvdec);
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> 

A similar question as with the previous patch: shouldn't there be a
put_device(pm->larbvdec); in the mtk_vcodec_release_dec_pm() function?

Same for the next patch.

Regards,

	Hans