linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] iommu/tegra-smmu: Expand mutex protection range

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7bcf39ad-a254-7601-af44-c05805113930@gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 3 Oct 2020 17:28:04 +0300
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To:     Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>, thierry.reding@...il.com,
        joro@...tes.org
Cc:     vdumpa@...dia.com, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hch@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] iommu/tegra-smmu: Expand mutex protection range

29.09.2020 20:42, Dmitry Osipenko пишет:
> 29.09.2020 09:13, Nicolin Chen пишет:
>> This is used to protect potential race condition at use_count.
>> since probes of client drivers, calling attach_dev(), may run
>> concurrently.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>
>> ---
> 
> It's always better not to mix success and error code paths in order to
> keep code readable, but not a big deal in the case of this particular
> patch since the changed code is quite simple. Please try to avoid doing
> this in the future patches.
> 
> Also, please note that in general it's better to use locked/unlocked
> versions for the functions like it's already done for
> tegra_smmu_map/unmap, this will remove the need to maintain lockings in
> the code. The code touched by this patch doesn't have complicated code
> paths, so it's good enough to me.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
> 

Tested-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>