linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next 00/23] rxrpc: Fixes and preparation for RxGK

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20201003.143252.1162624907281801666.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Sat, 03 Oct 2020 14:32:52 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     dhowells@...hat.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/23] rxrpc: Fixes and preparation for RxGK

From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2020 22:24:55 +0100

> David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> 
>> > Since the fixes in the set need to go after the patches in net-next, should I
>> > resubmit just those for net-next, or sit on them till -rc1?
>> 
>> My 'net' tree is always open for bug fixes, and that's where bug fixes
>> belong.  Not 'net-next'.
> 
> "Need to go after the patches in net-next" - ie. there's a dependency.

If the bugs exist before your net-next changes, that doesn't make any
sense.  The fixes have to be against whatever is in 'net'.

If the fixes are introduced by your net-next changes, you should
integrate them into your net-next changes.