lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <42898d8c-e95a-bc07-3e6e-0ead4bc9e17d@wanyeetech.com>
Date:   Mon, 5 Oct 2020 05:26:07 +0800
From:   Zhou Yanjie <zhouyanjie@...yeetech.com>
To:     Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
Cc:     "open list:MIPS" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Kernel 5.9-rc regression.


在 2020/10/2 上午5:55, Thomas Bogendoerfer 写道:
> On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 04:15:43AM +0800, Zhou Yanjie wrote:
>> Hi Thomas and list,
>>
>> There is a strange phenomenon in kernel 5.9-rc: when using kernel 5.9-rc
>> with debian 10 and running htop, the memory footprint will be displayed as
>> 3.99T. When the actual memory footprint increases, the displayed value will
>> be reduced to 3.98T, 3.97T etc. These phenomena have been confirmed in
>> X1000, X1830, and JZ4780 (disable SMP), this phenomenon does not seem to
>> affect the SMP processor. When the JZ4780 turn on SMP, the memory footprint
>> will be displayed normally.
> try this fix
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201001203931.GD2706729@carbon.DHCP.thefacebook.com/


It works, thanks!


> Thomas.
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ