[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0eb34c71-3e1c-9950-de30-6b163d7cca3a@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 17:39:49 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...il.com>
Cc: ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] arm64: dts: qcom: pm8994: Add thermal-zones for
temp alarm
On 05/10/2020 17:28, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> Don't you want to add a 'hot' trip point, so userspace can get the
>> notification and have an opportunity to do some action like unplugging
>> some CPU before a wild shutdown happens ?
>
> PM8998 doesn't do that and so I followed.
>
> Anyway, msm8992/4 will never have all CPUs online at once, unless
> it's put in a freezer, so unplugging isn't much of an argument :D
What do you mean by they are not "online at once" ?
> If you want though, I can resend this patch AND add a hot point to pm8998.
It is just a suggestion, it is up to you and the SoC maintainer.
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists