linux-kernel - Re: [sched/fair] fcf0553db6: netperf.Throughput

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201005064959.GD2628@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Mon, 5 Oct 2020 08:49:59 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com>
Cc:     Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...ts.01.org,
        lkp@...el.com, ying.huang@...el.com, feng.tang@...el.com,
        zhengjun.xing@...el.com, aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com,
        yu.c.chen@...el.com
Subject: Re: [sched/fair] fcf0553db6: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -30.8%
 regression

On Sun, Oct 04, 2020 at 09:27:16PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> Greeting,
> 
> FYI, we noticed a -30.8% regression of netperf.Throughput_Mbps due to commit:
> 
> 
> commit: fcf0553db6f4c79387864f6e4ab4a891601f395e ("sched/fair: Remove meaningless imbalance calculation")

This is the middle of a series that reworks the load balancer. Does this
regression still exist at the end of it?

Which would be around:

  57abff067a08 ("sched/fair: Rework find_idlest_group()")

or possible a little later, Vincent?