[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <12ee5c1b-66a7-22d5-29f1-31e25cfbe32e@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 18:03:51 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...il.com>
Cc: ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] arm64: dts: qcom: pm8994: Add thermal-zones for
temp alarm
On 05/10/2020 17:49, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> What do you mean by they are not "online at once" ?
>
> msm8992/4 are infamous for their thermal issues. Manufacturers have
> been known for straight up disabling some cores or tuning the kernel
> in such a way that some cores get disabled due to the thermal
> constraints.
Thanks for the clarification.
I was imagining some kind of hardware feature :)
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists