| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAP-5=fXwQZVDxJM4LmEvsKW9h0HYP6t3F0EZfy0+hwAzDmBgGA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 09:28:20 -0700
From: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>,
Kajol Jain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: Issue of metrics for multiple uncore PMUs (was Re: [RFC PATCH v2
23/23] perf metricgroup: remove duped metric group events)
On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 3:06 AM John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> On 02/10/2020 21:46, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 5:00 AM John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 07/05/2020 15:08, Ian Rogers wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Ian,
> >>
> >> I was wondering if you ever tested commit 2440689d62e9 ("perf
> >> metricgroup: Remove duped metric group events") for when we have a
> >> metric which aliases multiple instances of the same uncore PMU in the
> >> system?
> >
> > Sorry for this, I hadn't tested such a metric and wasn't aware of how
> > the aliasing worked. I sent a fix for this issue here:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200917201807.4090224-1-irogers@google.com/
> > Could you see if this addresses the issue for you? I don't see the
> > change in Arnaldo's trees yet.
>
> Unfortunately this does not seem to fix my issue.
>
> So for that patch, you say you fix metric expression for DRAM_BW_Use,
> which is:
>
> {
> "BriefDescription": "Average external Memory Bandwidth Use for reads
> and writes [GB / sec]",
> "MetricExpr": "( 64 * ( uncore_imc@..._count_read@ +
> uncore_imc@..._count_write@ ) / 1000000000 ) / duration_time",
> "MetricGroup": "Memory_BW",
> "MetricName": "DRAM_BW_Use"
> },
>
> But this metric expression does not include any alias events; rather I
> think it is just cas_count_write + cas_count_read event count for PMU
> uncore_imc / duration_time.
>
> When I say alias, I mean - as an example, we have event:
>
> {
> "BriefDescription": "write requests to memory controller.
> Derived from unc_m_cas_count.wr",
> "Counter": "0,1,2,3",
> "EventCode": "0x4",
> "EventName": "LLC_MISSES.MEM_WRITE",
> "PerPkg": "1",
> "ScaleUnit": "64Bytes",
> "UMask": "0xC",
> "Unit": "iMC"
> },
>
> And then reference LLC_MISSES.MEM_WRITE in a metric expression:
>
> "MetricExpr": "LLC_MISSES.MEM_WRITE / duration_time",
>
> This is what seems to be broken for when the alias matches > 1 PMU.
>
> Please check this.
Happy to check. Can you provide a reproduction? Looking on broadwell
this metric doesn't exist.
Thanks,
Ian
> Thanks,
> John
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ian
> >
> >> I have been rebasing some of my arm64 perf work to v5.9-rc7, and find an
> >> issue where find_evsel_group() fails for the uncore metrics under the
> >> condition mentioned above.
> >>
> >> Unfortunately I don't have an x86 machine to which this test applies.
> >> However, as an experiment, I added a test metric to my broadwell JSON:
> >>
> >> diff --git a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/x86/broadwell/bdw-metrics.json
> >> b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/x86/broadwell/bdw-metrics.json
> >> index 8cdc7c13dc2a..fc6d9adf996a 100644
> >> --- a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/x86/broadwell/bdw-metrics.json
> >> +++ b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/x86/broadwell/bdw-metrics.json
> >> @@ -348,5 +348,11 @@
> >> "MetricExpr": "(cstate_pkg@c7\\-residency@ / msr@tsc@) * 100",
> >> "MetricGroup": "Power",
> >> "MetricName": "C7_Pkg_Residency"
> >> + },
> >> + {
> >> + "BriefDescription": "test metric",
> >> + "MetricExpr": "UNC_CBO_XSNP_RESPONSE.MISS_XCORE *
> >> UNC_CBO_XSNP_RESPONSE.MISS_EVICTION",
> >> + "MetricGroup": "Test",
> >> + "MetricName": "test_metric_inc"
> >> }
> >> ]
> >>
> >>
> >> And get this:
> >>
> >> john@...alhost:~/linux/tools/perf> sudo ./perf stat -v -M
> >> test_metric_inc sleep 1
> >> Using CPUID GenuineIntel-6-3D-4
> >> metric expr unc_cbo_xsnp_response.miss_xcore *
> >> unc_cbo_xsnp_response.miss_eviction for test_metric_inc
> >> found event unc_cbo_xsnp_response.miss_eviction
> >> found event unc_cbo_xsnp_response.miss_xcore
> >> adding
> >> {unc_cbo_xsnp_response.miss_eviction,unc_cbo_xsnp_response.miss_xcore}:W
> >> unc_cbo_xsnp_response.miss_eviction -> uncore_cbox_1/umask=0x81,event=0x22/
> >> unc_cbo_xsnp_response.miss_eviction -> uncore_cbox_0/umask=0x81,event=0x22/
> >> unc_cbo_xsnp_response.miss_xcore -> uncore_cbox_1/umask=0x41,event=0x22/
> >> unc_cbo_xsnp_response.miss_xcore -> uncore_cbox_0/umask=0x41,event=0x22/
> >> Cannot resolve test_metric_inc: unc_cbo_xsnp_response.miss_xcore *
> >> unc_cbo_xsnp_response.miss_eviction
> >> task-clock: 688876 688876 688876
> >> context-switches: 2 688876 688876
> >> cpu-migrations: 0 688876 688876
> >> page-faults: 69 688876 688876
> >> cycles: 2101719 695690 695690
> >> instructions: 1180534 695690 695690
> >> branches: 249450 695690 695690
> >> branch-misses: 10815 695690 695690
> >>
> >> Performance counter stats for 'sleep 1':
> >>
> >> 0.69 msec task-clock # 0.001 CPUs
> >> utilized
> >> 2 context-switches # 0.003 M/sec
> >>
> >> 0 cpu-migrations # 0.000 K/sec
> >>
> >> 69 page-faults # 0.100 M/sec
> >>
> >> 2,101,719 cycles # 3.051 GHz
> >>
> >> 1,180,534 instructions # 0.56 insn per
> >> cycle
> >> 249,450 branches # 362.112 M/sec
> >>
> >> 10,815 branch-misses # 4.34% of all
> >> branches
> >>
> >> 1.001177693 seconds time elapsed
> >>
> >> 0.001149000 seconds user
> >> 0.000000000 seconds sys
> >>
> >>
> >> john@...alhost:~/linux/tools/perf>
> >>
> >>
> >> Any idea what is going wrong here, before I have to dive in? The issue
> >> seems to be this named commit.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> John
> >>
> >>> A metric group contains multiple metrics. These metrics may use the same
> >>> events. If metrics use separate events then it leads to more
> >>> multiplexing and overall metric counts fail to sum to 100%.
> >>> Modify how metrics are associated with events so that if the events in
> >>> an earlier group satisfy the current metric, the same events are used.
> >>> A record of used events is kept and at the end of processing unnecessary
> >>> events are eliminated.
> >>>
> >>> Before:
> > .
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists