linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/2] ACPI: EC: PM: Drop ec_no_wakeup check from acpi_ec_dispatch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4751045.iUa6gZp90W@kreacher>
Date:   Mon, 05 Oct 2020 19:13:46 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:     Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Todd Brandt <todd.e.brandt@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ACPI: EC: PM: Drop ec_no_wakeup check from acpi_ec_dispatch_gpe()

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>

It turns out that in some cases there are EC events to flush in
acpi_ec_dispatch_gpe() even though the ec_no_wakeup kernel parameter
is set and the EC GPE is disabled while sleeping, so drop the
ec_no_wakeup check that prevents those events from being processed
from acpi_ec_dispatch_gpe().

Reported-by: Todd Brandt <todd.e.brandt@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/ec.c |    3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/ec.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/ec.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/ec.c
@@ -2011,9 +2011,6 @@ bool acpi_ec_dispatch_gpe(void)
 	if (acpi_any_gpe_status_set(first_ec->gpe))
 		return true;
 
-	if (ec_no_wakeup)
-		return false;
-
 	/*
 	 * Dispatch the EC GPE in-band, but do not report wakeup in any case
 	 * to allow the caller to process events properly after that.