[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <64ccf7f562b753572b123d747c43222eb99378f8.camel@perches.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2020 11:46:54 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Cc: Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>,
Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
Clang-Built-Linux ML <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH next-20200930] treewide: Convert macro and uses of
__section(foo) to __section("foo")
On Mon, 2020-10-05 at 11:36 -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> I don't think there's anything wrong with manually including it and adding `-I
> <path>` (capital i) if needed.
All of this is secondary to the actual change to use
quoted __section("foo") rather than __section(foo)
I'd rather get that done first and then figure out if
additional changes could be done later.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists