lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1d8396cb33b33c3d0107ba701b7e597041dfdbc2.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Mon, 05 Oct 2020 12:37:35 -0700
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
        lukas.bulwahn@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] checkpatch: add new warnings to author signoff
 checks.

On Tue, 2020-10-06 at 00:54 +0530, Dwaipayan Ray wrote:
> The author signed-off-by checks are currently very vague.
> Cases like same name or same address are not handled separately.

When you run tests for this, how many mismatches are
caused by name formatting changes like:

From: "Developer, J. Random" <jrd@...corp.com>
...
Signed-off-by: "J. Random Developer" <jrd@...corp.com>?

Should these differences generate a warning?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ