[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a5cba9bb723626091f8790c794efe8de4ab184b8.camel@perches.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2020 00:18:17 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
lukas.bulwahn@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] checkpatch: add new warnings to author signoff
checks.
On Mon, 2020-10-05 at 12:18 +0530, Dwaipayan Ray wrote:
> The author signed-off-by checks are currently very vague.
> Cases like same name or same address are not handled separately.
>
> For example, running checkpatch on commit be6577af0cef
> ("parisc: Add atomic64_set_release() define to avoid CPU soft lockups"),
> gives:
>
> WARNING: Missing Signed-off-by: line by nominal patch author
> 'John David Anglin <dave.anglin@...l.net>'
>
> The signoff line was:
> "Signed-off-by: Dave Anglin <dave.anglin@...l.net>"
>
> Clearly the author has signed off but with a slightly different version
> of his name. A more appropriate warning would have been to point out
> at the name mismatch instead.
>
> Introduced three new types of warnings:
>
> 1) Address matches, but names are different.
> "James Watson <james@...il.com>", "James <james@...il.com>"
>
> 2) Name matches, but addresses are different.
> "James Watson <james@...son.com>", "James Watson <james@...il.com>"
>
> 3) Name matches, but addresses without mail extensions are same.
> "James Watson <james@...il.com>", "James Watson <james+a@...il.com>"
>
> For the 3rd class, a --strict check message is generated, and for the
> other two, warnings are generated.
I don't have any issue with the concept, but please
be consistent with spacing after if tests.
Always use a single space after if
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> @@ -2347,6 +2347,7 @@ sub process {
> my $signoff = 0;
> my $author = '';
> my $authorsignoff = 0;
> + my $authorsignoff_ctx = '';
ctx isn't a descriptive name.
Maybe $author_sob
> @@ -2674,9 +2675,34 @@ sub process {
> if ($line =~ /^\s*signed-off-by:\s*(.*)/i) {
> $signoff++;
> $in_commit_log = 0;
> - if ($author ne '') {
> + if ($author ne '' && $authorsignoff != 1) {
Has space after if
> if (same_email_addresses($1, $author)) {
> $authorsignoff = 1;
> + } else {
> + my $ctx = $1;
> + my ($email_name, $email_comment, $email_address, $comment1) = parse_email($ctx);
> + my ($author_name, $author_comment, $author_address, $comment2) = parse_email($author);
> +
> + if($email_address eq $author_address) {
No space after if, etc...
> @@ -6891,9 +6917,32 @@ sub process {
> if ($signoff == 0) {
> ERROR("MISSING_SIGN_OFF",
> "Missing Signed-off-by: line(s)\n");
> - } elsif (!$authorsignoff) {
> - WARN("NO_AUTHOR_SIGN_OFF",
> - "Missing Signed-off-by: line by nominal patch author '$author'\n");
> + } elsif ($authorsignoff != 1) {
> + # authorsignoff values:
> + # 0 -> missing sign off
> + # 1 -> sign off present
sign off identical
> + # 2 -> address matches, name different
> + # 3 -> name matches, address different
> + # 4 -> name matches, address matches without extension
extension here isn't obvious
> +
> + my $ctx_msg = "'Signed-off-by: $authorsignoff_ctx' should be:\n'Signed-off-by: $author'";
New line not necessary or useful really.
And for mismatches, it's really not known that
it should be one way or the or the other is it?
> +
> + if($authorsignoff == 0) {
> + WARN("NO_AUTHOR_SIGN_OFF",
> + "Missing Signed-off-by: line by nominal patch author '$author'\n");
> + }
> + elsif($authorsignoff == 2) {
> + WARN("NO_AUTHOR_SIGN_OFF",
> + "Author name mismatch:\n$ctx_msg\n");
> + }
> + elsif($authorsignoff == 3) {
> + WARN("NO_AUTHOR_SIGN_OFF",
> + "Author address mismatch:\n$ctx_msg\n");
> + }
> + elsif($authorsignoff == 4) {
> + CHK("NO_AUTHOR_SIGN_OFF",
> + "Author mail extension mismatch:\n$ctx_msg\n");
> + }
> }
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists